| ▲ | CursedSilicon 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm sure the usual detractors will be here to whine "Electrek is biased against Tesla!" To which I would ask: Is it "bias" because they simply report on Tesla frequently? Would it be "less biased" if they ignored Tesla? Obviously Electrek can't simply invent positive press for Tesla to report on. Putting that aside though. The Cybertruck by all measures has been an abject failure. Its production run was so limited that insurance companies refused to cover it [1] and the NHTSA took something like two years just to crash test the thing due to how few of them there were on the road. Combine that with 10 fucking recalls for absolutely horrific safety issues [2] and the company making the batteries taking a 99% slash in its $2.8 billion dollar contract [3] the thing is a complete travesty [1] https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/insurance... [2] https://www.cnet.com/home/electric-vehicles/every-tesla-cybe... [3] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-12-29/tesla-cyb... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aeternum 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fred Lambert (Electrek founder) was pro-tesla and was using his site to get a huge number of referral credits. Then Tesla changed the rules on that referral program. That's what triggered the beef. Fred sold all shares, took down all the pro-tesla articles, and posts nearly exclusively only negative tesla articles since. Seems both parties were/are within legal rights, but it is clearly bias. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 1234letshaveatw 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elecdrek's bias against Tesla is only surpassed by its gushing over any/everything China. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||