> Well then that will be something for the courts to sort out, especially in the open carry states.

They already sorted it out - in open carry states. In the above situation, the court in open carry state sides with cops.

It is really simple. Sentencing cop for on duty murder is extraordinary hard even in clear cut cases. Guns presence means a cop can say he was afraid. And afraid cop is entitled to kill.

> But I think you are underestimating the effect it will have on individual federal agents, who might decide the pay isn't good enough anymore.

You are over estimating it. They would just shoot and feel good about it.

Even if they left, the state would send better trained troop the next time.

▲

anon84873628 4 hours ago | parent [-]

During BLM protests there were anti-protesters doing exactly what I described, and they were not automatically shot at by police. Of course the political roles are reversed, but I don't believe it is as guaranteed as you suggest. And the legality is of course much more complicated than you portray as well.

	▲	watwut 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The courts decided exactly like I said when cops shot. That the cops shown more restraint in BLM case is good. The political roles being different is key factor - ICE wants to kill and this administration wants them to kill. It makes them feel manly. Frankly, the theory that armed forces would step back is absurd. They are cowards, but they are not afraid to kill. They are so afraid of everything that they are more likely to kill And other side are people with moral limits. People who are not afraid and are showimg courage every day, but not murderers. And ICE knows that. No one in ICE fears life ... they fear being emasculated.