Why though? Bottles/cans are easily recycled and I believe the small reimbursement is easily recovered during the recycling costs.

It's not profitable to recycle small electronic devices otherwise you'd see heaps of shops doing it. It's toxic, hazardous and labour intensive.

100 times the deposit amount would be like $5-10 USD per-device which is insane. I do agree that any retailers should be required to take back empties and dispose of them responsibly.

▲

FractalParadigm 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> It's not profitable to recycle small electronic devices otherwise you'd see heaps of shops doing it. It's toxic, hazardous and labour intensive.

Sounds like they should be banning their sale and/or production then, just like many jurisdictions have been with plastics and other non-recyclable items. These devices are not an essential-to-life item where the waste produced is justifiable, especially when you consider the LiPo batteries, which are a borderline-environmental disaster from the moment the lithium is mined to the day that battery finds its way to a landfill. Why single-use disposable vaping devices exist in the first place is somewhat perplexing given permanent/re-fillable ones are also available, often right beside the disposable ones, and generally offer a significantly lower cost of ownership.

	▲	normie3000 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Why single-use disposable vaping devices exist in the first place is somewhat perplexing given permanent/re-fillable ones are also available I suspect you could make the same argument for manufactured cigarettes vs pipe tobacco. It seems people will pay for convenience.

▲

diffeomorphism an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because they are a fire hazard:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62vk0p5dn5o

Trash compactors break the batteries in these things. A deposit could help to ensure that the vapes are disposed responsibly.

Other option: Add an "electronics" bin everywhere. Though that would be more expensive and less clear how effective it would be.

▲

computersuck an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's very profitable to recycle small electronics in some economies where thousands of companies do it (eg India or Shenzhen); in countries where human labour is more expensive, it's untenable

▲

throwmeoutplzdo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How and why are the environmental effects not a factor for you?

▲

gnopgnip 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I see more vape litter on the beach than bottles and cans. The deposit is part of why that is

▲

seemaze 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I just received a $10 deposit refund for returning my motorcycle battery to the battery shop.

▲

zelon88 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That's a good point. In America we call this type of deposit a "core charge." The "core" is the component you return to the store to get your deposit back.

This is done for components like starter motors, alternators, power steering pumps, batteries, and a variety of other components. The complex components are re-manufactured to like-new specifications and the less complex components are recycled to recover materials. The battery is a probably the only component where the potential ecological impact drives the cost of the deposit.

	▲	pests 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I never thought about it but it is odd car-components are the only thing most people will experience with a "core" charge. Why don't more industries do something similar? Is it just because car ownership and car repair has been such a core (no pun intended) component of American culture? That a system of recycling has been set up?
	▲	mindslight 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Lead actually has a pretty good scrap value.

▲

5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]