You're offering a very generous interpretation. To the point of extrapolating what's written. Allow me to exemplify:

> I genuinely don't mind if other people vibe code. Go for it!

> But that is not enough for the vocal proponents. It's the future!

The author is okay for others to voice their positive opinion about LLMs as long as it is limited to vibe coding.

It starts defining a gatekeeping threshold of what level of positive opinion is acceptable for others to have, according to the author.

Nothing in the text you quoted implies anything of the sort, and you're moving the goalposts.

Good day.