| ▲ | rtpg 3 hours ago | |
now sometimes that's 4 hours, but I've had plenty of times where I'm "racing" people using LLMs and I basically get the coding done before them. Once I debugged an issue before the robot was done `ls`-ing the codebase! The shape of the problem is super important in considering the results here | ||
| ▲ | jason_oster 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
You have the upper hand with familiarity of the code base. Any "domain expert" also necessarily has a head start knowing which parts of a bespoke complex system need adjustment when making changes. On the other hand, a highly skilled worker who just joined the team won't have any of that tribal knowledge. There is a significant lag time getting ramped up, no matter how intelligent they are due to sheer scale (and complexity doesn't help). A general purpose model is more like the latter than the former. It would be interesting to compare how a model fine tuned on the specific shape of your code base and problem domain performs. | ||