|
| ▲ | zamadatix 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think the intent was making a blog has additional requirements one might not need to just make a website, a la what the "The Hard Way" section tries to argue against, not a claim a blog is not also a website (anything the page says not to use will also lead you to having a website as well - just with more than minimal work). E.g. the section covering RSS for your post is longer than the section covering HTML, you don't really need a fixed structure, and you don't need to think of a story to write unless that's what you want to do. You can just post a picture of your cat and try to add googly eyes later if that's what floats your boat. Or just "Hello World" and let your mind go from there. |
|
| ▲ | NoSalt 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes, but the author's title framed it as a generic "website", not a specific web log site. |
|
| ▲ | celsius1414 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Kids these days forgetting what blog is short for! ;) |
| |
| ▲ | susam 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | In the past, I've had a few visitors to my website look at a possibly silly post and ask me why it was even worth blogging about. That is when I bring out the expanded form of 'blog' in all its glory. It is my weblog. Of course I am going to log whatever I want for myself, regardless of whether it is interesting to others. I do not need to subscribe to someone else's notion of what is interesting in order to decide what belongs on my own weblog. |
|
