| ▲ | echelon 8 hours ago |
| One day soon many musicians will be using AI assistance, and many won't tell you for fear of judgment. It's like that with code and art. Purely AI anything is garbage. But AI tools in the hands of people who know what they're doing are just faster scaffolding and better plywood to build with. The framing is still mostly human expert. |
|
| ▲ | gs17 8 hours ago | parent [-] |
| > One day soon many musicians will be using AI assistance, and many won't tell you for fear of judgment. Word on the street here in Nashville is that it's already the case. The songs getting published aren't AI-made, but there's AI assistance. |
| |
| ▲ | RobotToaster 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Auto tune uses a form of "AI", and has been used by most pop singers for a decade. | | |
| ▲ | sheeh 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Auto tune is not what makes a song a hit. What make a song a hit is the fact that the person who injected the use of auto tune has taste. This seems to fly over the heads of many. art is about taste. | | |
| ▲ | RevEng 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | The same argument applies to AI generated or assisted music. Anyone can write a prompt and get a song. It takes judgement and taste to pick a good song and choose to publish it. | | |
| ▲ | amanaplanacanal 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | "New technologies have the tendency to replace skills with judgement – it's not what you can do that counts, but what you choose to do, and this invites everyone to start crossing boundaries." - Brian Eno |
|
|
|
|
