| ▲ | ecshafer 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-profits don't really stop any of that. Plenty of non-profits are after perverse incentives to gather as much money as they can to just pay higher ups more money, and use the non-profit status to pay employees less. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | TimTheTinker 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Maybe there's a third way. What about a company owned by a "perpetual purpose trust" - i.e. a trust with a defined purpose that is legally binding. It's the only shareholder, so no extracting value and all profits have to comply with the trust's bylaws in how they are used. Patagonia (US company) is one example of this; it's profits are legally bound to go toward environmental causes. Bosch and Zeiss in Germany are comparable - they are Verantwortungseigentum (Steward-Ownership). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Plenty of non-profits are after perverse incentives to gather as much money as they can to just pay higher ups more money Where is this specifically, in the US? Usually the laws of the country prevent this, since they're you know... Non-profits... But wouldn't surprise me there are a few leftover countries who refuse to join the modern world. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||