| ▲ | trashb 3 hours ago | |
I thought you meant a hello world or similar program only handling strings would be fundamentally insecure but rather you mean that it is hard to write secure code with C strings. There are indeed a lot of pitfalls and footguns in C in general but I would argue that has more to do with c's memory focused design. I always feel like C strings are a bit of an afterthought but it does confirm well with the C design. Perhaps it is more so a syntax issue where the memory handling of strings is quite abstracted and not very clear to the programmer. | ||
| ▲ | lou1306 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> I thought you meant a hello world or similar program only handling strings would be fundamentally insecure but rather you mean that it is hard to write secure code with C strings. Disclaimer: I am not the author of the comment, and honestly I am more than happy if OpenBSD broke %n in printf because it looks awful from a security standpoint. > you mean that it is hard to write secure code with C strings. Indeed I do :) It is possible to write a "secure" hello world program in C; the point is that both the language and the standard library make it exceedingly easy to slip in attack vectors when you deal with strings in any serious capacity. | ||