| ▲ | xlii 4 hours ago | |||||||
Allow me (today) to be that person to propose checking out Jujutsu instead [0]. Not only it has a superpower of atomic commits (reviewers will love you, peers will hate 8 small PRs that are chained together ;-)) but it's also more consistent than git and works perfectly well as a drop-in replacement. In fact, I've been using Jujutsu for ~2 years as a drop-in and nobody complained (outside of the 8 small PRs chained together). Git is great as a backend, but Jujutsu shines as a frontend. | ||||||||
| ▲ | Zambyte 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Also been using Jujutsu for about 2 years. I feel like I have learned so much about how git actually works by simply not using git. | ||||||||
| ▲ | _flux 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think I'd love to use Jujutsu, but I enjoy Magit (for Emacs) too much to entertain the thought of switching :/. Besides, Magit rebasing is also pretty sweet. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | vlovich123 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
How do you handle publishing the stack? | ||||||||