|
| ▲ | squeaky-clean 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's 4 days traveling. Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday. Arriving in the evening doesn't mean you didn't spend that day traveling. |
|
| ▲ | tdeck 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I did this once from Seattle. It was a good experience, but the internet connection was nonexistent along large parts of the route. Also one way cost like $1,200. |
|
| ▲ | amypetrik214 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| - the internet connection is excellent I mean, maybe you had a different experience. In my experience in the northeast , the internet service is about as reliable and consistent as the trains themselves (ie not consistent, garbage fire) |
|
| ▲ | esseph 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you're not traveling between those specific destinations it can take far, far longer. Amtrak is a joke. |
| |
| ▲ | reincarnate0x14 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Amtrak is decent on very specific routes and still an absolute joke to anyone who has used trains in Europe, Japan, Taiwan, etc, and no personal experience but I'd imagine China too. My friend takes the Amtrak route up and down the Pacific coast precisely because she's stuck on a train for days and can't be disturbed while doing boring paperwork as an anti-procrastination strategy. Although the observation cars do have great views. |
|
|
| ▲ | dyauspitr 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Let’s be realistic. I love long distance train journeys, but mainly for recreation. Being on a train for 3-5 days is pretty exhausting no matter how comfortable. I’ve done the 30 day Amtrak pass before and it was fantastic but I wouldn’t be looking forward to that if it was a work trip where I want to fly in and then get back to my family as fast as possible. There’s no way that can compare to a 5-6 hour flight+2 hours at the airport. |
|
| ▲ | CursedSilicon 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I was rather disappointed by the internet connection on the Cascades line (going Seattle --> Portland and back). As far as I could tell, they use T-Mobile for backhaul. Who are headquartered in Seattle. Yet the connection barely seemed to work for about half of the journey |
| |
| ▲ | grogenaut 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | boo, it's in the middle of no where along part of the route. Tmobile coverage is mainly in urban areas and along free ways no matter what slingblade tells you on the tv commercial. I don't know if you'd get any coverage on parts of that route other than wired. Just like how sometimes when you're flying over the rockies or into canada you just don't get internets. There's still middles of no where out there. Often not very far from the freeway. | | |
|
