Remix.run Logo
bsimpson 4 hours ago

Blows my minded that a 4k 27" monitor that was $500 a dozen years ago is still near top tier now.

5k has been surprisingly stagnant.

SoftTalker 4 hours ago | parent [-]

At some point additional resolution is a dimishing return. The human eye has limits.

robotresearcher 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

5K 27” looks usefully better than 4K 27” to my middle aged eyes.

I’d prefer that to not be so, because 5K panels are so much more expensive. But in a side by side comparison it’s very obvious.

But the market has spoken: a quality 4K display is very good, certainly good enough, and the value for money is great.

I’m ok with spending more on a better display that I spend so much time with. The cost per use-hour is still very, very low.

intrasight 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We're approaching that point but are not there yet