| ▲ | zozbot234 5 hours ago | |
In a way, negative temperature is higher than the highest positive temperature. High positive temperatures just gives you a uniform distribution on all possible tokens, highly negative temperatures is the same behavior. As you reach the low-negatives, you place more and more weight on unlikely tokens. This makes more intuitive sense if inverse temperature is the physically relevant quantity, since you then have a smooth change as you cross from positive inverse temperature into negative, with zero standing for a uniform distribution and high positive (resp. negative) inverse temperatures just placing more and more weight on likely (resp. unlikely) tokens. | ||
| ▲ | dnautics 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
This is such a good way to put it (and it cleanly falls out of the exponential equation) > inverse temperature is the physically relevant right there in the equation! | ||
| ▲ | ggggffggggg 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
This was super clear and interesting, thanks! | ||