| ▲ | the__alchemist 6 hours ago | |||||||
This is an clarifying perspective. In particular, I think this sheds light on understanding the various perspectives in the thread: > Viewed through the lens of digital autonomy and citizenship, the question isn’t simply “Is Linux perfect?” but rather: Do we want our fundamental computing environment to be ultimately under our control, or controlled by private interests with their own incentives? We make choices, become passionate about some, and wear values we feel strongly about on our shoulder. What we witness here, I believe, is a conflation of two things: A: Linux as a value: Representing open source software, rejecting bad corporate behavior, and as a philosophy for software ownership B: Linux as a collection of related operating systems, as practical software. I think trying to understand each person's perspective, and if it can be categorized as one or the other makes sense of this article, similar ones, and discussion. Someone in Category B evaluating operating systems as tools should not be viewed by someone in Category A as an affront to their identity. It may just be different use cases; different hardware; different priorities; different variants and versions of operating systems used. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bb88 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The people who wanted A created B. It's not really a conflation but more of a causal reality. | ||||||||
| ||||||||