| ▲ | coffeemug 11 hours ago |
| Strongly disagree. Claude Code is the most intuitive technology I've ever used-- way easier than learning to use even VS Code for example. It doesn't even take weeks. Maybe a day or two to get the hang of it and you're off to the races. |
|
| ▲ | johnsmith1840 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The difference is AI tooling lies to you. Day 0 you think it's perfect but the more you use ai tools you realize using them wrong can give you gnarly bugs. It's intuitive to use but hard to master |
| |
| ▲ | coffeemug 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It took me a couple of days to find the right level of detail to prompt it. Too high level, and the codebase gets away from me/the tooling goes off the rails. Too low level, and I may as well do it myself. Maybe also learn the sorts of things Claude Code isn't good at yet. But once I got in the groove it was very easy from there. I think the whole process took 2-3 days. |
|
|
| ▲ | simonw 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Don't underestimate the number of developers who aren't comfortable with tools that live in the terminal. |
| |
| ▲ | coffeemug 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I actually don't use it in the terminal, I use the vs code extension. It's a better experience (bringing up the file being edited, nicer diffs, etc.) But both are trivial to pick up. | |
| ▲ | HDThoreaun 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well these people are left behind either way. Competent devs can easily learn to use coding assistants in a day or two |
|