But it’s not theft, because you’re not redistributing. It’s allowed, just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content.

▲

TrackerFF 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Sure. But if I see listen to some song, and copy it, and release it, I could get sued. Even if I claim that I'm merely inspired by the original content - the court doesn't care.

You don't need to redistribute the original material, it's enough that you just copied it.

	▲	Altern4tiveAcc 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> But if I see listen to some song, and copy it, and release it, I could get sued. This is what should be fixed in the first place, then. You shouldn't get sued from what you do with your copy of a song.

▲

amelius 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> just like humans are allowed to learn from copyrighted content

humans learning : machines learning == whale swimming : submarine swimming

It's not the exact 100% same thing. Therefore you cannot base any rights on it.

If you still don't buy it, consider this analogy:

killing a human vs. destroying a machine

Thank god that we're not using your line of thinking here.

	▲	Agentus 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]