To be fair, the people who barely use the computer are the easiest to move to Linux. As Mental Outlaw said, "to a normie, an OS is just a bootloader for Google Chrome". If all you do is check emails, it doesn't really matter what OS you have installed.

Switching to Linux hasn't been an issue for those users for a long time - it's usually gamers, users of professional software, or IT people with deeply established workflows who have troubles

I guess the only part that matters is updates, and atomic systems like Fedora Silverblue do allow you to enable automatic updates without the fear of breaking everything, which is great

▲

odie5533 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Laptop battery life suffers greatly on Linux. When their Google Chrome bootloader is out of battery all day, it matters which OS they installed.

▲

fuzzy2 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Doesn't matter though. Every single one of these "casual" users I know has a terribly outdated device with a broken battery that doesn't even charge anymore.

And I agree: if it works, why replace it?

▲

evilduck 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

People who care deeply about unplugged battery life aren't on Windows to begin with.

▲

tapoxi 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This doesn't make much sense, ChromeOS is itself Linux, and those are prime "computers for parents" machines.

	▲	johnny22 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		not the same thing at all. Different userspace that may or may not be that efficient at power, as well as well tested power management in the kernel for specific devices.

▲

Salgat 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

My old man was using Ubuntu 20 years ago because all he needed was a browser and openoffice. Shoot, with a live cd you can even make computer use foolproof since it's impossible for them to permanently break it.