So… what?

With all due respect I don’t care about an acceleration in writing code - I’m more interested in incremental positive economic impact. To date I haven’t seen anything convince me that this technology will yield this.

Producing more code doesn’t overcome the lack of imagination, creativity and so on to figure out what projects resources should be invested in. This has always been an issue that will compound at firms like Google who have an expansive graveyard of projects laid to rest.

In fact, in a perverse way, all this ‘intelligence’ can exist. At the same time humans can get worse in their ability to make judgments in investment decisions.

So broadly where is the net benefit here?

▲

simonw 13 hours ago | parent [-]

You mean the net benefit in widespread access to LLMs?

I get the impression there's no answer here that would satisfy you, but personally I'm excited about regular people being able to automate tedious things in their lives without having to spend 6+ months learning to program first.

And being able to enrich their lives with access to as much world knowledge as possible via a system that can translate that knowledge into whatever language and terminology makes the most sense to them.

▲

teeeew 13 hours ago | parent [-]

“I'm excited about regular people being able to automate tedious things in their lives without having to spend 6+ months learning to program first.”

Bring the implicit and explicit costs to date into your analysis and you should quickly realise none of this makes sense from a societal standpoint.

Also you seem to be living in a bubble - the average person doesn’t care about automating anything!

▲

bathtub365 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The average person already automates a lot of things in their day to day lives. They spend far less time doing the dishes, laundry, and cleaning because parts of those tasks have been mechanized and automated. I think LLMs probably automate the wrong thing for the average person (i.e., I still have to load the laundry machine and fold the laundry after) but automation has saved the average person a lot of time

▲

zeroonetwothree 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

For example, my friend doesn’t know programming but his job involves some tedious spreadsheet operations. He was able to use an LLM to generate a Python script to automate part of this work. Saving about 30 min/day. He didn’t review the code at all, but he did review the output to the spreadsheet and that’s all that matters.

His workplace has no one with programming skills, this is automation that would never have happened. Of course it’s not exactly replacing a human or anything. I suppose he could have hired someone to write the script but he never really thought to do that.

▲

zahlman 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What sorts of things will the average, non-technical person think of automating on a computer that are actually quality-of-life-improving?

▲

simonw 5 hours ago | parent [-]

My favorite anecdotal story here is that a couple of years ago I was attending a training session at a fire station and the fire chief happened to mention that he had spent the past two days manually migrating contact details from one CRM to another.

I do not want the chief of a fire station losing two days of work to something that could be scripted!

	▲	gjadi 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don't want my doctor to vibe script some conversion only to realize weeks or months later it made a subtle error in my prescription. I want both of them to have enough fund to hire someone to do it properly. But wanting is not enough unfortunately...

▲

simonw 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Also you seem to be living in a bubble - the average person doesn’t care about automating anything!

One of my life goals is to help bring as many people into my "technology can automate things for you" bubble as I possibly can.