And so in the future if you want to add a feature, either the LLM can do it correctly or the feature doesn’t get added? How long will that work as the TUI code base grows?

▲

simonw 14 hours ago | parent [-]

At that point you change your attitude to the project and start treating it like something you care about, take control of the architecture, rewrite bits that don't make sense, etc.

Plus the size of project that an LLM can help maintain keeps growing. I actually think that size may no longer have any realistic limits at all now: the tricks Claude Code uses today with grep and sub-agents mean there's no longer a realistic upper limit to how much code it can help manage, even with Opus's relatively small (by today's standards) 200,000 token limit.

▲

zahlman 11 hours ago | parent [-]

The problem I'm anticipating isn't so much "the codebase grows beyond the agent-system's comprehension" so much as "the agent-system doesn't care about good architecture" (at least unless it's explicitly directed to). So the codebase grows beyond the codebase's natural size when things are redundantly rewritten and stuffed into inappropriate places, or ill-fitting architectural patterns are aped.

	▲	svara 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Don't "vibe code". If you don't know what architecture the LLM is producing, you will produce slop.