| ▲ | culi 16 hours ago |
| There is no legal requirement for it to refer to MIL-SPEC. More often than not it is just pure marketing without any actual spec tied to it |
|
| ▲ | OneDeuxTriSeiGo 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yeah if you see something labelling itself "MIL-SPEC", that's grade A snake oil bullshit. That said military spec stuff is actually generally a good sign that something is of higher quality than random off the shelf garbage but only if you know there's a specific spec you want it to work with. And most of the time you aren't even necessarily looking for a MIL-STD (standard) but rather a MIL-PRF (performance rating/spec). So like if something is "MIL-SPEC" run. But if you see say a spool of fiber that is "MIL-STD-1678 compliant" and more importantly "MIL-PRF-49291 compliant" and "MIL-PRF-85054 compliant", that's probably a really good sign that it'll do its job. The former PRF documenting perf requirements for the fiber itself and the latter PRF the cabling/sheath's corrosion and deterioration resistance. It's the military so odds are it'll probably cost extra for that and it'll still kinda suck but it'll suck in exactly the way they promised. |
| |
|
| ▲ | hsbauauvhabzb 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Military grade afaict just implies the military ‘could’ use it, by that definition almost any company sells military grade products or services, except companies who explicitly would not sell to the military. |
| |
| ▲ | JohnFen 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In the US, "military grade" is like "natural". There is no legally enforced meaning, so it means whatever the manufacturer says it means. Sometimes that's something real and of some value, but the majority of the time it's just a meaningless marketing buzzword. | |
| ▲ | bluGill 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | the military often writes a spec and then refuses to buy anything that doesn't meet it. Most soldiers are not going to walmart to get supplies - even f walmart sells that type of thing. | | |
| ▲ | hsbauauvhabzb 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’m not talking about what the military could or would use, I’m talking about what it takes for something to be called military grade. | | |
| ▲ | colechristensen 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | "military grade" isn't a protected phrase. As a consumer you might be able to sue them if the thing breaks and they can't prove that phrase meant anything? But doubtful. Claiming to conform to a more specific product or process standard would be more specific fraud. But in general though "military grade" is a red flag for shitty marketing. Example: pop tarts are military grade! [1] Though their commercial packaging is likely not. https://www.dla.mil/Portals/104/Documents/TroopSupport/Subsi... |
|
| |
| ▲ | deadbabe 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Original Gameboys are military grade, and even in the gulf war when they were used, there was one that survived being melted. | | |
| ▲ | normie3000 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Used for what? | | |
| ▲ | cweagans 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you had one, you could also buy games in the form of “cartridges”. Putting one of those cartridges into the gameboy would let you play the game for as long as the batteries held out. |
|
|
|