I suspect this would only matter much if they also remembered (and cared about) their own prior play.

Not really. Only as far as their table image mattered--in this case, zero. Otherwise, you can and should ignore your own past play.

What I'm curious about is if their innate training is enough to give them biases. Like maybe they think Grok is full of shit.

	▲	zahlman 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Not really. Only as far as their table image mattered--in this case, zero. Right; there's feedback to it. When humans play poker, they do so with common knowledge of the fact that humans have object permanence and can recognize and remember their opponents. The same thing that motivates "profiling" a villain, motivates attempting to project a table image, which in turn motivates being aware of the table image one is projecting.