New attack models are using shielded electronics that don't need GPS and are immune to traditional jamming. Relying on computer vision and old school navigation math.

Go ~X speed for Y distance(+/-) on Z heading until you reach A landmark and then start a new set of instructions.

▲

cyanydeez 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, but not in ukraine. They brute forced fiber, fly by wire.

Dead reckoning via inertial sensors, cameras, etc are way to complex for the flight controllers without heavier hardware since theyre hugely inefficient.

AI at the sophistication to do this stuff is essentially bloatware. Like running electron instead of a bare metal gui.

▲

DrewADesign 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I’m interested in reading up on that. Where did you see it?

▲

_boffin_ 14 hours ago | parent [-]

You can take a look into inertial navigation systems and then also terrain mapping

▲

DrewADesign 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Everything I’ve found about the drones in that conflict indicates they use automated navigation for pursuit once a target is locked, but human pilots before then.

▲

_boffin_ 14 hours ago | parent [-]

you described two different steps: human pilots get to desired area and target locked. For the human part, if the drone isn't using fiber optic and is getting jammed (many types of jamming), the human pilot might not be able to communicate with the drone. If that's the case, how will the drone get to the desired area? that's where the two things i posted come into play.

	▲	DrewADesign 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I understand the technology and the purpose, in context. I’m curious about how they’re actually using this stuff because I haven’t seen anywhere say that they actually are.