I am still having trouble understand how that pertains to the post to which it replied. Here are those 2 points again:

1. In the US, enrolling in health insurance is currently a choice (I'm can't tell whether your hypothesis about healthy people is agreeing or disagreeing with this point).

2. We don't want Billy to be screwed for life just because he was born to a suboptimal combination of parents.

Would you mind clarifying the connection here, please?

▲

Workaccount2 18 hours ago | parent [-]

1. I'm saying the choice is faux. Healthy people will have dramatically lower medical bills throughout their life, so why shouldn't they get discounted health insurance? Which leads to your second point which I already addressed in my initial post:

2. >This is why there is a hyperfixation on shifting blame away from (failing) individuals. The logic breaks when Billy has to admit he just hates exercising.

	▲	ImPostingOnHN 16 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Healthy people will have dramatically lower medical bills throughout their life, so why shouldn't they get discounted health insurance? I never said they shouldn't. It's just a topic totally unrelated to whether or not people are forced to buy insurance, and I'm not interested in discussing that new, unrelated topic. > Billy has to admit he just hates exercising. This logic breaks down when Billy actually exercises and eats just fine, but was nonetheless born to a suboptimal combination of parents.