It's been like that for 15 years or more.

The fact that you now need an account for almost any piece of hardware, including computers, phones etc is a major drawback that arrived with the internet era. Linux has been able to avoid that temptation.

▲

dannyfritz07 a day ago | parent [-]

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. 15 years ago I was still looking up installation and driver procedures and workarounds to install Linux on my devices. I failed to install arch in college because I didn't have a driver for my SATA drive for example.

Today though. Yeah totally easy. Especially if you get one of the many machines with Linux support. Smooth sailing all around.

▲

noAnswer 18 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Facetiously: Well actually, you didn't need a driver for the SATA drive but the SATA controller.

Something that was also true for Windows and such a common problem that many BIOSes would offer a IDE compatibility mode one could switch to.

26 years ago I installed SUSE and it just worked on my self build PC. Smooth sailing all around. Than I tried Debian and couldn't for the life of me get X11 to work.

So yeah, the distro and hardware lottery is still a problem.

▲

mixmastamyk 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Windows has also needed external drivers installed at times, since the DOS days. It's the nature of obscure, new, or advanced hardware.

▲

Kye 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The difference was the device came with a disk containing the driver for DOS and Windows.

▲

jacquesm 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't see how that is Linux' fault.

	▲	Kye 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I didn't say it was. This discussion is about relative difficulty of setting things up. It is, objectively, more difficult when you need to download a driver for new hardware and the NIC on your laptop needs a driver your distro didn't come with.