I find it ironic that the article is warning against AI use while it uses an AI-made cover image. Surely they find the same fault with copyright issues and AI art? Right?

There's some irony in that, sure. But at the heart of the matter is privacy. It's about what you input into the chat, not about the output.

It’s not against AI. It’s against privacy issues arising though data mining & double speech.

> This isn’t just a health assistant. This is infrastructure for a healthcare marketplace.

It's an AI written article IMHO.