| ▲ | whilenot-dev a day ago | |
For me, it's a matter of authenticity at scale... Let's assume I want every citizen to navigate the web freely while fighting propaganda machines as much as possible, so that means I want an automated system that creates the set difference between these two in real-time, as reliable as possible. To create such a system, and since there shouldn't be any overlap in these two sets, I can effectively put my efforts in half if I put my work in the detection of one such set. The scaling problem, as I see it here, arises from the following: While the set of individual citizens (kind of) has an upper limit, represented by the number of internet users worldwide, the botnet nodes in propaganda machines do not. I can limit the set further, for example if I want to focus on the citizens that are part of my government only, whereas propaganda machines can come from anywhere on the globe. Internet users already need to provide a proof on authentication for quite a lot of services, while botnets generally want to avoid being identified as such. While I'm far from in favor of Chat Control, I can somewhat understand why these initiatives are in motion at all. > The EU is more of a threat to itself than Russia is To put it mildly, this conclusion is non-sequitur at best. | ||