I agree that people clearly don't use critical thinking 100% of the time and are easily influenced.

But you're basically arguing for not criticizing the status quo.

Many social improvements have been attained by "attacking the foundations of society". How would you like living under some absolute monarchy? How do you think gay people would like to live in a church-run society like 500 years ago?

▲

tankenmate a day ago | parent [-]

"But you're basically arguing for not criticizing the status quo.", but that wasn't what was argued ("You should be able to insult and criticise the Prime Minister."), but more your interpretation of what was said. You're making a strawman argument.

▲

vladvasiliu a day ago | parent [-]

Well, the PM isn't exactly the status quo, I wasn't replying to that. Rather, I was responding to this specific bit, emphasis mine:

> You should not be able to gain a position of power and then go on a crowded stage to claim that vaccines cause autism. This is intolerable. We are attacking the foundations of society.

Not sure when the strawman is. "The foundations of society", for me, means "the way things are". Which can be vaccines, sure, or any kind of general policy which has been showed to have a positive effect on society, but it can also be all kinds of things taken for granted which aren't necessarily rooted in reason.

	▲	Imustaskforhelp 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		To be really honest, I share a similar stance to you overall but I would still admit that there is some partial truth to it I would like to expand this not only to foreign state actors that people mention but also companies inside which are actively trying to do nefarious stuff As an example, Tobacco industry knew that the damages were there but they still tried to spur up medical confusion around it all so that people would still think that medical discussion is going on when it was 100% clear that tobacco harms. Who knows how many people died The man who discovered that washing hands saved lives was so ridiculed and I think met with hostility because doctors couldn't comprehend the idea that it was they would could spread diseases. This is decades before germ theory was invented His name is Ignaz Semmelweis and the world was unjust to him. Doctors ridiculed and threatend him and he was labelled obsessive and doctors called it mere coincidence. His career crumbled as he was forced out of vienna/his hospital and his mental health deteriorated as his warnings were ignored in 1865 Semmelwise was commited to an asylum where he died just two weeks later at age 47 Only after pasteur developed germ theory and lester pioneered antisceptic surgery, semmelwise was finally vindicated. This simple practise of handwashing is now considered the most basic medical standard worldwide saving countless millions of lives in the process. (I had to write it by hand here basically transcribing this really amazing video that I watched about such a topic, I would highly suggest watching it) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBCOh1SYQYA (crazy people who were proven right) Semmelwise's stories can brings chills to spine.