Remix.run Logo
ComputerGuru a day ago

I eagerly clicked the link but they're just looking for another vendor that does the same thing. It's like boycotting Marlboro only to buy from Camel.

nxobject a day ago | parent | next [-]

And what are the chances of a smaller vendor being any more secure?

ryan_n a day ago | parent | next [-]

Them being more secure would be good, but it's still mass surveillance of citizens without much justification.

notyourwork a day ago | parent [-]

Decentralized surveillance. Only mass if it’s all cohesively accessible by one entity.

cowsandmilk 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Which is definitely the case for flock and likely for other companies.

fn-mote a day ago | parent | prev [-]

With a bar this low? Pretty good.

mc32 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean, the product makes their jobs easier and cheaper (for investigations). People may debate that, but these things come down to efficiency.

So, whether it's vendor A or Vendor B municipalities don't care. What they want is the capability. The municipalities have the backing of the communities -with few odd exceptions because most people in most communities want LE to "catch the perps."