| ▲ | hyrix a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
These chemicals are derived from plants where even pedants would classify them as poisons. The genus name Boophone is from the Greek bous = ox, and phontes= killer of, a clear warning that eating the plant can be fatal to livestock. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cluckindan 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Huh, so telephone is killer of distance and Persephone is killer of… Persians? Grain? Vegetation? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | icyfox a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Fair point about the source, but the classification usually follows the mode of delivery, not the organism of origin. Many plant-derived compounds function as venoms once introduced into the bloodstream (arrow coatings, darts, etc.), even if they’re also toxic when ingested. Curare is one example of a plant-based compound - lethal in blood, but largely harmless if eaten. So while Boophone is absolutely a poison in the ecological sense, using it on arrows still fits the venom/toxin distinction better than a purely ingested poison. Otherwise why would people hunt with this if they got sick the second they ate the meat? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||