"UK police made over 12,000 arrests under laws criminalizing communications causing 'annoyance or anxiety,' with arrests rising 58% since 2019" [1]. Only 10% lead to a conviction. What then, is it, other than a government issuing arrests for speech?

[1]: https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/london-braces-for-free-speech-sho...

▲

jacquesm a day ago | parent | next [-]

The vast bulk of those cases are about online harassment, usually against former spouses, public servants, etc. If you are aware of a case where an individual was arrested for just expressing their opinion you are welcome to provide the evidence. Until then this is just FUD. Censorship is bad, protecting the rest of the citizens from harassment is the kind of thing that is actually useful.

▲

immibis a day ago | parent | prev [-]

What were they arrested for saying?

▲

j-krieger a day ago | parent [-]

Are you expecting me to comb through thousands of cases? Obviously they were arrested for saying legal things, if their arrest doesn't follow a conviction in 90% of cases.

	▲	joe463369 a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		If you're going to claim that people get arrested in the UK for criticising the government, it's reasonable to expect you have an example to hand.
	▲	immibis 19 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I expect that when you say someone was arrested for speech and it's government overreach (as opposed to a legitimate arrest), you should show us the speech they were arrested for, to back up your claim that it's overreach.