| ▲ | IncreasePosts a day ago | |||||||||||||
If someone says they believe in free speech, they have to let me spraypaint anything I want on their house. Otherwise they're a hypocrite. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ben_w a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
If they publicly state that the house is a "town square" (he has said that of twitter), and they say that they are a "free speech absolutist" (he has said this of himself in the context of this house/town square/website), and state that "By 'free speech,' I simply mean that which matches the law.", then yes, if they don't let you spray-paint (tweet) whatever you want that's not strictly unlawful (like, ah, calling for civil disorder in the UK?), they are indeed a hypocrite. When the house is digital (twitter is), why even use spray paint as the analogy? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pavel_lishin a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
When Musk bought twitter, he all-but-explicitly said "I have finally bought this house, which I will let anyone spray paint". | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | adrr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Italy can use the same argument. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | UqWBcuFx6NV4r a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Intellectually dishonest analogy but I’m sure you already know this. | ||||||||||||||