I wonder what the rate of "getting killed by some rando along the way" actually is. Sure, lots of anecdotes, and I don't really know how you'd measure it, but I'm curious how it plays out by the real numbers.

▲

JackFr a day ago | parent | next [-]

For men I suspect the “killed by a rando” number is pretty low, but robbery/theft is very high. Of course if you have nothing to steal, that does insulate you a little.

For women I suspect the “killed by a rando” number is low, but the sexual assault number is higher.

▲

dheera a day ago | parent | prev [-]

s/killed/harassed/ and the numbers are pretty damn high at least in my circle

▲

SketchySeaBeast a day ago | parent [-]

The rate of being killed is pretty damn high in your circle? What is s/killed? Or is it just a harassment issue? If it's so high, why keep doing it? I'm struggling to understand the risk/reward, and what the risk actually is compared to what it's perceived to be.

▲

bryanlarsen a day ago | parent [-]

s/foo/bar/ is search & replace foo with bar. So yes, they're saying the rate of harassment is high. Even if we posit that >99% of men aren't harassers, a solo female traveler is going to encounter a lot more than 100 men, so is quite likely to be harassed.

	▲	SketchySeaBeast a day ago \| parent [-]
		> s/foo/bar/ is search & replace foo with bar. Ah, thank you.