> If an assistant offered up suggested code, the code ran successfully, and the user accepted the code, that was a positive signal, a sign that the assistant had gotten it right.

So what about all those times I accepted the suggestion because it was "close enough", but then went back and fixed all the crap that AI screwed up? Was it training on what was accepted the first time? If so I'm sincerely sorry to everyone, and I might be single-handedly responsible for the AI coding demise. :'-D