> limited in scope, ultra-well defined, testable

Are we talking about the same CSS?

▲ mexicocitinluez 15 hours ago | parent [-]

lol People don't realize that Tailwind democratized styling for a lot of people who didn't want to or didn't know how to write CSS. We're not going back to writing hand-crafted CSS with or without LLMs. LLMs, by their nature, work better with Tailwind since it needs a much smaller context to make the right decision.

▲ doodlesdev 14 hours ago | parent [-]

   > We're not going back to writing hand-crafted CSS with or without LLMs.

A lot of us have never stopped writing hand-crafted CSS. Also, in my experience, Gemini 3 Pro is an absolute monster at writing layouts and styling in pure CSS with very basic descriptions of what I want (tested it while I was experimenting with vibe coding in some sleepless night LOL).

There are still a lot of developers who loathe using Tailwind and avoid touching it like the plague. Handwritten CSS still offers more opportunities for optimization and keeps your markup much cleaner than spamming utility classes everywhere (I understand the appeal of rapidly iterating with it, though).

	▲	mexicocitinluez 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I apologize, I was being a bit hyperbolic. I spent a decent amount of time working in marketing and ad agencies, and there are absolutely still needs for custom CSS in that area, so I agree. I was more pushing back against the idea that Tailwind will be replaced by vanilla CSS because of LLMs.