| ▲ | VerifiedReports a day ago |
| What is "zero-shot" supposed to mean? |
|
| ▲ | onion2k 20 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| zero-shot is a single prompt (maybe with additional context in the form of files.) few-shot is providing a few examples to steer the LLM multi-shot is a longer cycle of prompts and refinement |
| |
| ▲ | mikkupikku 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I've been calling good results from a single prompt "single-shot." Is this not right? | | |
| ▲ | flimflamm 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | No as you could have multiple examples of expected output in single prompt.
You should just "ask" - that's zero shot.
If you "ask + provide" examples then you are in the n+1 shot realm.
But I suppose terminology is shifting from this... |
| |
| ▲ | samtheprogram 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is one-shot. | |
| ▲ | moffkalast 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | if you had one-shot or one opportunity | | |
|
|
| ▲ | carteazy a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I believe in this case it means that you do not need to provide other voice samples to get a good clone. |
| |
| ▲ | spwa4 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | It means there is zero training involved in getting from voice sample to voice duplicate. There used to be models that take a voice sample, run 5 or 10 training iterations (which of course takes 10 mins, or a few hours if you have hardware as shitty as mine), and only then duplicate the voice. This you give the voice sample as part of the input, and immediately it tries to duplicate the voice. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | mikalauskas a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |
