| ▲ | wrs a day ago | |||||||
AFAICT, Tailwind is largely (not entirely) a different, shorter syntax for writing inline styles. (E.g., "class: 'bg-white'" = "style: 'background-color: white'".) If you've rejected structural CSS to begin with, I sort of get the point that it saves a lot of typing; otherwise I don't see how it helps all that much over SASS or just modern plain CSS. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rvnx a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Tailwind is a dirty hack, normally you are supposed to declare a class, which you apply to items of the same concept. This is the cause for CSS to exist. Front devs got lazy, and started writing for each element, position: absolute; left:3px, top:6px, color:red;... You could write <font color="red">Hello</font> this would be similar "cleanliness" | ||||||||
| ||||||||