| ▲ | cjs_ac 2 days ago | |||||||
Prestigious boarding schools - the schools that I’ve been writing about - need not bother with teachers outside that top 25%. Non-selective government schools, like all public services, have inevitably become largely concerned with social work; teachers in those schools, regardless of their ability, have to respond to parents immediately. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sokoloff 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> teachers in those schools, regardless of their ability, have to respond to parents immediately. Or else what? Their union will hold them to account? Their colleagues? Their administration? I have two kids in such public schools and I can’t think of anything I’d ask of a teacher that would require a same-day response let alone an immediate one. If I need an immediate response, it’s not likely a topic I should be taking to a teacher in the first place. Their job is to teach, not to monitor for inbound comms from parents. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | waterhouse 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> need not bother with teachers outside that top 25%. To simply "not bother" with lower-quality teachers sounds like you find it easy, as an institution, to determine teachers' quality. That seems far from a solved problem, for teachers and indeed most employees in general. You can pick a particular metric, of course, but then people will try to game it, and in teaching, there seems to be a lot of room for gaming metrics... | ||||||||
| ▲ | rvba 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Yes nothing bad has never happened in a prestigious boarding school, just because they charge more money, especially to kids of rich people. After all rich people and their rich kids never do anything wrong /s | ||||||||
| ||||||||