| ▲ | AstroBen 2 days ago | |
IDEs vs vim makes a lot of sense. AI really does feel like using an IDE in a certain way Using AI for me absolutely makes it feel like I'm more productive. When I look back on my work at the end of the day and look at what I got done, it would be ludicrous to say it was multiple times the amount as my output pre-AI Despite all the people replying to me saying "you're holding it wrong" I know the fix to it doing the wrong thing. Specify in more detail what I want. The problem with that is twofold: 1. How much to specify? As little as possible is the ideal, if we want to maximize how much it can help us. A balance here is key. If I need to detail every minute thing I may as well write the code myself 2. If I get this step wrong, I still have to review everything, rethink it, go back and re-prompt, costing time When I'm working on production code, I have to understand it all to confidently commit. It costs time for me to go over everything, sometimes multiple iterations. Sometimes the AI uses things I don't know about and I need to dig into it to understand it AI is currently writing 90% of my code. Quality is fine. It's fun! It's magical when it nails something one-shot. I'm just not confident it's faster overall | ||
| ▲ | llmslave2 a day ago | parent [-] | |
I think this is an extremely honest perspective. It's actually kind of cool that it's gotten to the point it can write most code - albeit with a lot of handholding. | ||