| ▲ | throwthrowuknow 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Even if Opus 4.5 is the limit it’s still a massively useful tool. I don’t believe it’s the limit though for the simple fact that a lot could be done by creating more specialized models for each subdomain i.e. they’ve focused mostly on web based development but could do the same for any other paradigm. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | emodendroket 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That's a massive shift in the claim though... I don't think anyone is disputing that it's a useful tool; just the implication that because it's a useful tool and has seen rapid improvement that implies they're going to "get all the way there," so to speak. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bayindirh 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Personally I'm not against LLMs or AI itself, but considering how these models are built and trained, I personally refuse to use tools built on others' work without or against their consent (esp. GPL/LGPL/AGPL, Non Commercial / No Derivatives CC licenses and Source Available licenses). Of course the tech will be useful and ethical if these problems are solved or decided to be solved the right way. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||