>It's not "normal competition" to be displaced by immigrants in your own country

Is it? It's just free market deciding you are not needed. What's the problem with that? Are you against the free marker or something?

▲

RealityVoid 2 days ago | parent [-]

Nah, these are all just taking points to be used when it's convenient, discarded when it's not. You can't expect internal consistency.

▲

Muromec 2 days ago | parent [-]

Yeah, having to compete with institutional capital for house ownership here is fine, but them having to compete with people from a country where they speak foreign languages is not fair. The duality of libertarian thinking.

	▲	happytoexplain 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I am against free market absolutism. I also think it's unrealistic to expect humans to put up with any and all examples of large foreign influxes that disrupt a person's local life/culture, as much as it would be nice for everybody to just be compatible with each other.
	▲	palmotea 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> Yeah, having to compete with institutional capital for house ownership here is fine, but them having to compete with people from a country where they speak foreign languages is not fair. The duality of libertarian thinking. Any libertarian that's not extremely wealthy is stupid and was duped by propaganda. Also there's an important difference between "institutional capital buying houses" and immigration: the former is all invisible lawyers in the background (you'd have no idea without investigative journalism), and the latter can be much more palpable to your average guy on the street. IMHO, an extremely important parts of how present-day elites maintain power in our current capitalist system is how they use diffuse responsibility and misdirection to deal with threats to their interest.