>> I need 1 agent that successfully solves the most important problem

In most of these kinds of posts, that's still you. I don't believe i've come across a pro-faster-keyboard post yet that claims AGI. Despite the name, LLMs have no agency, it's still all on you.

Once you've defined the next most important problem, you have a smaller problem - translate those requirements into code which accurately meets them. That's the bit where these models can successfully take over. I think of them as a faster keyboard and i've not seen a reason to change my mind yet despite using them heavily.

▲

TeodorDyakov 2 days ago | parent [-]

Why do you assume AGI needs to have agency?

▲

ponco 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Not OP, but I think that without some creative impetus like 'agency', how useful is an AGI going to be?

	▲	TeodorDyakov 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		If cars do not have agency how useful are they going to be. If the Internet does not have agency how useful is going to be. if fire has no agency (debatable) how useful is going be.

▲

losvedir 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Call it what you want, but people are going to call the LLM with tools in a loop, and it will do something. There was the AI slop email to Rob Pike thing the other day, which was from someone giving an agent the instruction to "do good", or some vague high level thing like that.