> [I'm] the creator of Claude Code.

but also

> Claude Code works great out of the box, so I personally don't customize it much.

Am I the only one to notice the irony of this juxtaposition?

For lots of software unless you really know what you are doing it's best to just leave the default settings alone and not dig too deep into what's not immediately intended to do. For my application lots of bug reports come from people using our advanced settings without reading any of the instructions at all and screwing it up

So in the case of him being the creator obviously he built it for his needs

What’s ironic? He made a good product that works well without needing to configure it?