| ▲ | danielmarkbruce 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You can't have taken a class on finance and/or accounting and passed it. This is 101 material, literally. Read the CPAs take. And, in my initial comment i explicitly point out the error - the interest amount should not be there. People don't tend to show the working for zero * x = zero. This misunderstanding of a very fundamental piece makes any material on this topic by this author not worth reading. It might render everything they write not worth reading because they also don't know where their circle of competence stops. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | grog454 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not OP and not an accountant. I see the reasoning for accountants keeping future liabilities off of the balance sheet. I do this myself in multiple contexts. Still, when making decisions about whether to take out or grant a loan (personal or business) I need to consider future "value" and cash flows. To someone running a business this is probably more important than the balance sheet. So I think the interest recording criticism is valid but relatively minor in the context of the whole article. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||