You really need to add a toggle for the effects, it makes it hard to read.

Turning off javascript gets rid of the crazy.

	▲	zamadatix 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		And reading mode can be a good option too. Particularly if it's more about the styling/contrast.

thefz 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

At least this one isn't presented as a back and forth between two furry characters

fennecfoxy 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

You make that sound like it wouldn't make it even better uwu

FireInsight 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Dialogue has been a form of presentation forever. (See, Plato and most of literature)

	▲	spoiler 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I don't mind the dialogue, but if we're taking about the same author, some of the content gets diminished by the meandering waffling. I realise it's a stylistic choice but there's been a few posts where I felt tired after reading their articles. And it also feels like one of those YouTube shorts sketches where one person pretends to be multiple people and it starts feeling a bit cheap/meh. I think it would be fine if it they toned down on the interjections/interruptions
	▲	thefz 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		So Is illustration as shown by hieroglyphics, this doesn't make me want it more. I can understand text just fine

Rendello a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The typeface is called `monofur`, so technically all the text is composed of furry characters.

extraduder_ire a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are you referring to a specific blogpost? Doesn't sound familiar.

	▲	Analemma_ a day ago \| parent [-]
		They might be talking about Xe Iaso's blog, although there the furry conversations are only for short supplementary asides sotto voce, while the bulk of every post is in ordinary text. I like it, personally, but maybe it grates on some people.

Oh no, the horror.

corndoge 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No they don't, it's their website.

2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

prmoustache 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

	▲	napkinartist 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I work in accessibility. I'm non binary and queer AF. The particles are a problem for some sensory processing disorders that cannot tune out motion. This is why the prefer reduced motion attribute exists. I appreciate that you and I probably agree that some people with anti-LGBTQ sentiments will pick on anything atypical about a website like this to claim some notional moral high ground to punch down, but in the case of the particles specifically there are disability accommodation reasons to consider them something toggleable. (Though using reader mode is probably sufficient for those users, as the site is developed to support it well.)
	▲	JCattheATM 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Some I think just have an aversion to effects, not because it's hard to read, that is often just the excuse, but because they just don't like them.

LAC-Tech 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Just don't read the article and comment based on the headline.