Remix.run Logo
tossaway0 2 days ago

I haven’t given it enough thought, but would a ban on selling ad space do the trick?

You can self promote, but you can’t pay third parties to do it for you and you can’t sell it as a service.

JumpCrisscross 2 days ago | parent [-]

> would a ban on selling ad space do the trick?

How would you define ad space?

> You can self promote, but you can’t pay third parties to do it for you and you can’t sell it as a service

An acid test I've found surprisingly powerful is that of the founders promoting the Constitution through pamphleteering. They wrote the pamphlets themselves. The historical record is silent on whether they paid for their printing or distribution. (The papers could publish due to subscribers and paid advertising.)

If your rule would let them pamphleteer, it should be fine. If it would not, it probably needs work. I have not yet seen a definition of advertising that satisfactorily isolates this.

tossaway0 2 days ago | parent [-]

Someone who prints something for a third party isn’t selling ad space.

Everyone could self promote, they just couldn’t contract someone to do it for them. Employees could promote for their employer, but it couldn’t be subcontracted out. And you can’t pay a company to put up your ad on their billboard or their website, etc.

Ignoring how this might be enforced, would it be enough to let people express themselves while cutting out the impact of negative externalities of advertising?

JumpCrisscross 2 days ago | parent [-]

> would it be enough to let people express themselves while cutting out the impact of negative externalities of advertising?

I think it's doable. But I haven't seen the scalpel yet.

In the meantime, we have clean lines we can run up towards. Banning ads (basically, commercial speech) in public space. Banning commercial bulk mail. And banning targeted commercial advertising (beyond the content it sits).