| ▲ | Levitz 2 days ago | |
Yes. I'm not even sure it's a question anymore. Yes it would be a better world. Not even because of the first order consequences of the ads, but because since there are ads, we have an entire media ecosystem based on grabbing your attention. So that TV displays series and movies meant for people with the attention span of a goldfish. This applies to Netflix and Hollywood by the way. All of it. Even music changes for radio, meaning more ads. Google, Youtube, etc, along with news, along with social networks, depend on ragebait, being the first to spout whatever factoid, true or false, polarization of thought and basically a good chunk of what is very evidently wrong in today's society. I trust we could support a weather app with donations. For the rest? If I could remove either ads or cancer from this world I would sit a long time thinking about the decision, but gut feeling? Ads. The actual cost of the ad industry is enormous and incalculable, not even mentioning the actual purposes ads serve. As for the rest, I'm very much a fan of the Bill Hicks standup bit regarding the subject. | ||