Everybody says how good Claude is and I go to my code base and I can't get it to correctly update one xaml file for me. It is quicker to make changes myself than to explain exactly what I need or learn how to do "prompt engineering".

Disclaimer: I don't have access to Claude Code. My employer has only granted me Claude Teams. Supposedly, they don't use my poopy code to train their models if I use my work email Claude so I am supposed to use that. If I'm not pasting code (asking general questions) into Claude, I believe I'm allowed to use whatever.

▲

spaceman_2020 2 days ago | parent [-]

What's even the point of this comment if you self-admittedly don't have access to the flagship tool that everyone has been using to make these big bold coding claims?

▲

hu3 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

isn't Claude Teams powerful? does it not have access to Opus?

pardon my ignorance.

I use GitHub Copilot which has access to llms like Gemini 3, Sonnet/Opus 4.5 ang GPT 5.2

▲

halfmatthalfcat 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Because the same claims of "AI tool does everything" are made over and over again.

▲

spaceman_2020 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

The claims are being made for Claude Code, which you don't have access to.

	▲	mr_mitm 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I believe part of why Claude Code is so great because it has the chance to catch its own mistakes. It can run compilers, linters, browsers and check its own output. If it makes a mistake, it takes one or two extra iterations until it gets it right.

▲

fragmede 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It's not "AI tool does everything", it's specifically Claude Code with Opus 4.5 is great at "it", for whatever "it" a given commenter is claiming.