Remix.run Logo
motbus3 3 days ago

I think the scenario is correct, the analysis for each choice seems to be realistic but this dialog would be finished after a couple of interactions for sure.

(I think 1.9 USD is more realistic than 19 USD for now. I don't want to say the product is bad, it is hard to evaluate it at 19 USD for this simple interaction. For a QA simulation with multiple choices seems quite pricey)

pingananth 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Fair point! $19 for just this one interaction would be steep.

The intention is that the license covers the Full Library (I'm building 12+ scenarios covering Firing, Performance Reviews, Hiring, etc.).

But your comment proves I failed to communicate that scope more better on the landing page. It looks like a 'Single Level' purchase right now, which is definitely not the value prop. I will revisit my messaging. Thanks for the heads up.

jtokoph 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I would argue that the price is too low. Any price under $200 is practically free to the employee with so many companies providing learning and development budgets.

pingananth 3 days ago | parent [-]

You hit the nail on the head regarding L&D psychology. For corporate budgets, $19 signals 'toy,' not 'training.'

My current logic: I'm optimizing for the individual dev/lead paying out of pocket who wants to start now without asking a manager for approval. The goal is to be below the 'mental friction' threshold for a personal impulse buy.

But for a Team/Enterprise version (where the manager buys it for 5 people), you are absolutely right—the pricing structure needs to look very different.

jtokoph 3 days ago | parent [-]

Many companies have discretionary budgets fully in control of the employee. For example, I had $2,500 per year to spend on valid expenses without needing prior approval.

pingananth 3 days ago | parent [-]

That sounds like a manager budget. My rationale of 19$ is considering the global audience and budget. I do have a vision of introducing team licenses later but currently focused on gathering volume and feedback!