> That's a polite way of phrasing "they've stolen a mountain of information and overwhelmed resources that humans would use to other find answers."

Yes, but I can't stop them, can you?

> But I'm glad you're able to have your fun.

Unfortunately I have to be practical.

> Doubtful. As the arms race continues AI DDoS bots will have less and less recent "training" material. Not a day goes by that I don't discover another site employing anti-AI bot software.

Almost all these BigCos are using their internal code bases as material for their own LLMs. They're also increasingly instructing their devs to code primarily using LLMs.

The hope that they'll run out of relevant material is slim.

Oh, and at this point it's less about the core/kernel/LLMs than it is about building ol' fashioned procedural tooling aka code around the LLM, so that it can just REPL like a human. Turns out a lot of regular coding and debugging is what a machine would do, READ-EVAL-PRINT.

I have no idea how far they're going to go, but the current iteration of Claude Code can generate average or better code, which is an improvement in many places.

▲ inferiorhuman 2 days ago | parent [-]

  The hope that they'll run out of relevant material is slim.

If big corps are training their LLMs on their LLM written code…

▲

oblio 2 days ago | parent [-]

You're almost there:

> If big corps are training their LLMs on their LLM written code <<and human reviewed code>>…

The last part is important.

	▲	inferiorhuman 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Until the humans are required to (or just plain want to) use LLMs to review the code.