This is just not true. I have wasted many hours looking for answers to hard-to-phrase questions and learned very little from the process. If an LLM can get me the same result in 30 seconds, it's very hard for me to see that as a bad thing. It just means I can spend more time thinking about the thing I want to be thinking about. I think to some extent people are valorizing suffering itself.

▲

codr7 2 days ago | parent [-]

Learning means friction, it's not going to happen any other way.

▲

onemoresoop 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Some of it is friction, some of it is play. With AI you can get faster to the play part where you do learn a fair bit. But in a sense I agree that less is retained. I think that is not because of lack of friciton, instead is the fast pace of getting what you want now. You no longer need to make a conscious effort to remember any of it because it's effortless to get it again with AI if you ever need it. If that's what you mean by friction then I agree.

▲

dcre 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I agree! I just don’t think the friction has to come from tediously trawling through a bunch of web pages that don’t contain the answer to your question.

▲

mountain_peak 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

"What an LLM is to me is the most remarkable tool that we've ever come up with, and it's the equivalent of a e-bike for our minds"

	▲	codr7 a day ago \| parent [-]
		Which is about as useful as a bike for our airplanes.